When David Hill went out for a bite to eat with friends at a Texas restaurant, he had no idea what kind of adventure he was about to embark on.
Little did he know that paying for his meal with a $20 bill would lead to an unexpected chain of events that would ultimately challenge the political bias of one employee and test the limits of acceptable currency usage in the United States.
After finishing lunch, Hill decided to pay for his meal with a $20 bill which had “Trump Lives Here” written on it in permanent marker across the White House illustration on its face.
After seeing this, the cashier refused to accept the money due to it being defaced and suggested Hill get more money from an ATM nearby instead.
When Hill explained that this was all he had on him, the cashier threatened to call police if payment wasn’t made another way – prompting Hill’s response that he could take it since “the money works”.
True enough, when a police officer arrived shortly after, they requested to see the bill and quickly determined that while defacing any form of currency is frowned upon, writing on bills does not make them invalid – so long as they can still be used as legal tender (a fact confirmed by US Code 18 U.S. Code § 333).
As demonstrated in this case however despite having writing printed across its face- this particular bill was still considered legally viable due to being able to function in other ways.
Nevertheless, when asked why she wouldn’t accept payment despite its validity, the cashier admitted her motives were politically motivated – stating anything with Trump’s name on it disgusted her and citing her refusal was because “he’s not my President”.
In response however, rather than punishing Hill for his beliefs or siding with her own political agenda, instead the officer informed both parties that either she must accept payment or lunch would be free today – forcing her hand into finally taking his money without further resistance.
While many may find themselves frustrated over instances like these where personal beliefs are put ahead of customer service obligations – there are valuable lessons we can learn from David Hill’s experience nonetheless.
It goes without saying but no matter your occupation or area of expertise- always strive towards treating all customers equally regardless of personal biases.
In most cases staff are required keep their own opinions aside whilst working public-facing roles in order ensure those around them feel welcomed comfortable during visits businesses establishments alike.
Furthermore given our increasingly divided society- it pays practice tolerance too especially when discussing sensitive topics such as religion or politics.
Finally whilst perhaps unintentional- David Hills tale provides us a wonderful example of activism.
It’s important to stand up for what you believe in even if the odds seem stacked against you.
So next time you’re out meet some friends eatery bar alike maybe take few moments reflect upon lesson learned here…who knows perhaps the end result just might surprise you.